CircleSeven 1960 Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 You are getting more worked up than you realize I think... I know I'm not. But since you "think" that, then it is what it is. Take it for what its worth. Send it to the cleaners.
ColumbusNewsFan 217 Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 Well, since you think that, then it is what it is. Take it for what its worth. Send it the cleaners. I mean I'm read what you previously wrote in this thread, and that is jif of what I'm getting from you here.
CircleSeven 1960 Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 I mean I'm read what you previously wrote in this thread, and that is jif of what I'm getting from you here. All I'm saying it, who would want to make these (and I think it was) asinine decisions to change a prominent branding. I don't care if they did some research (which I strongly think they didnt do their proper homework). I don't see anything "jif" about it.
effseesee 101 Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 All I'm saying it, who would want to make these (and I think it was) asinine decisions to change a prominent branding. I don't care if they did some research (which I strongly think they didnt do their proper homework). I don't see anything "jif" about it. Putting Dan Rather and Connie Chung together on the CBS Evening News was asinine. This? Not so much.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.