CircleSeven 1945 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 You are getting more worked up than you realize I think... I know I'm not. But since you "think" that, then it is what it is. Take it for what its worth. Send it to the cleaners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColumbusNewsFan 217 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Well, since you think that, then it is what it is. Take it for what its worth. Send it the cleaners. I mean I'm read what you previously wrote in this thread, and that is jif of what I'm getting from you here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleSeven 1945 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I mean I'm read what you previously wrote in this thread, and that is jif of what I'm getting from you here. All I'm saying it, who would want to make these (and I think it was) asinine decisions to change a prominent branding. I don't care if they did some research (which I strongly think they didnt do their proper homework). I don't see anything "jif" about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effseesee 101 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 All I'm saying it, who would want to make these (and I think it was) asinine decisions to change a prominent branding. I don't care if they did some research (which I strongly think they didnt do their proper homework). I don't see anything "jif" about it. Putting Dan Rather and Connie Chung together on the CBS Evening News was asinine. This? Not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.