Jump to content

Adam MadMan

Member
  • Posts

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Adam MadMan

  1. 3 hours ago, nycnewsjunkie said:

    I don’t think they have to revive “Bozo the Clown” or anything, but it would be refreshing to see local stations produce their own content. The way the TV market is going, they might just need to in order to stay relevant. The networks are prioritizing streaming, and the affiliates have become a secondary concern (Ex: CBS was willing to leave top-rated WRAL for basement-dweller WNCN just so they could receive reverse compensation.) Producing local programming other than news and the generic pay-for-play crap would at least be a step in making stations more relevant in their own communities again.

    Funny you mention Bozo. David Arquette bought the character last year and is looking to bring him back to the limelight. That said, I don't see any evidence that local TV stations are part of the equation.

     

    As for local stations making more diverse programming, I think the last major push for that kind of thing came from USA Broadcasting, who used WAMI in Miami as model for CityVision, which was supposed to be a group of stations emphasizing locally produced programming. Unfortunately, the WAMI experiment was a ratings disaster, and the rest of the USA stations abandoned the idea of a big local push in favor of just being run of the mill independent stations at a time when The WB and UPN were pushing those out, and Barry Diller gave up on the whole experiment within a few years, selling the stations to Univision to form the basis of Telefutura, now called UniMas.

     

    I can imagine the failure of the CityVision concept left a massive stink over the concept of local programming outside of news and pay-for-play, and it's probably why stations haven't been more daring. Still, that was in the late 90s and early 2000s, when cable was at its peak and internet video was barely a thing. Maybe it'd work better today, but I can still imagine some executive thinking back to CityVision and saying "Nope! Not again!"

    • Like 4
  2. I remember when Les Moonves first announced the CW name, even back then industry insiders thought the name was stupid. But executives felt it didn't matter; they were already full steam ahead, and they had no choice but to keep it. I can see the same thing here, and if anything, there's probably even less incentive to change it; unlike back then, The CW as a brand is firmly established. People know what it is, so why risk confusing the public with a new name? It was actually the same logic used by Nickelodeon executives when they decided against renaming it as part of their move to bring it up from the bottom of the cable ratings back in the mid 80s. Even though it didn't make much sense to the target audience (being inspired by a format that hadn't been relevant since before movies had sound), it was already known to the public, and in the long run, it didn't matter - Nickelodeon, as we all know, saw its ratings skyrocket, and was one of the highest rated networks on TV before streaming came along.

    • Like 4
  3. 9 hours ago, mrschimpf said:

     Rxdio, which going by this site has no real business plan for their Muzak service in the middle of the desert outside 'get TV spectrum...profit?'.

    Who's doing their business planning, underpants gnomes?

     

    I got confused when I saw the name on the list. When I went for Google, it just sent me to radio.com, the website of Audacy (formerly Entercom). I had to put in the actual URL to get the right page.

     

    Needless to say, I don't expect them to win either.

  4. Within the past month, cable network Oxygen has started to roll out OTA on subchannels of NBC/Telemundo O&Os. I noticed it a week or two ago, when a subchannel with the PSIP OXYGEN showed up on WVIT-DT4, though only yesterday did it actually start showing Oxygen programming, and watching both the cable and OTA feeds side by side, I was able to confirm that they're virtually identical.

     

    And in case you don't believe me, Trip of RabbitEars.info has logged the subchannels onto his site, which is a generally reliable source for OTA info.

    • Like 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Nelson R. said:

    WHNS replaces both the 7:30 and 11:30 airings of “People” with “Big Bang Theory.” beginning May 2.

     

    They will not be expanding the “Six O’Clock News” to an hour. Instead “Big Bang Theory remains at 6:30. 
     

    “Tamron Hall” replaces BBT and Sheldon at 3.

     

    A double run of Young Sheldon will be airing at midnight and “Extra” gets pushed back to 2am followed by another run of “Ag Day”. Young Sheldon remains at 7 so apparently they get three Young Sheldons. Maybe the extra YS is a placeholder until they do expand the Six O’Clock news and they move the 6:30 BBT to 12:30.
     

    WGCL replaces the 7pm “People” with a newscast and WPCH replaces it at 10:30 with “Friends.”

     

    Haven’t looked up the other ex-Meredith markets.

    WSHM still lists People for the time being (on Titan TV, at least), but WFSB will be starting a 7 pm newscast.

     

    Gray in general has been rather gung-ho about replacing syndicated programming with news and other local programming. Just look at WBTV in Charlotte. Of course, regulars of this site are probably all too familiar with this trend so it's probably like saying the sky is blue, but I thought it was relevant to point out, since it means less room for syndie programming going forward.

  6. Sinclair's Comet diginet ran a Planet of the Apes movie marathon last weekend, and somehow got 1.5 million average views on it.

     

    I'm not sure how exactly they're counting those numbers (I've noticed Litton pulling some monkey business with their Saturday morning E/I fare, adding up the total viewers of all the shows rather than an average), but whatever the case, Sinclair's not passing up the opportunity to brag.

    Quote

    "While it's been widely recognized that viewers are leaving cable for OTT, it's important to  note viewers are also moving to new, free OTA broadcast networks, and 1.5 million viewers  is proof of this,”  said Adam Ware VP, Growth Networks and Content at Sinclair.  

     

  7. 1 hour ago, carolinanews4 said:

    Will a moderator please just shut down this thread. The forum standards of quality state users are to be held to a "work safe" standard, yet one poster is cussing in their responses. And now that same poster has reduced this conversation to name calling. It is pretty sad that people can't make their point without personally attacking someone who disagrees with them. This same thing happened last month on the Standard General / Tegna thread.

    IKR? Kinda hard to make a civil conversation when people are going "blah blah stay positive" "blah blah you're naive" "blah blah give them a chance" "blah blah they don't deserve it" "blah blah calm down" "blah blah shut up you bleepity bleep nitwit".

     

    This is what happens when religion and/or politics collide with business. Things get UGLY.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  8. 21 minutes ago, TheSpeedKing said:

    How could they be that cheap?? Again, this station is not worth your time. Watch WRAL or WTVD instead. 

    The sad thing is, it's still more competitive than WRDC ever was.

    • Like 2
  9. WSHM has run Dr. Oz at 5 PM between newscasts here in Springfield, MA, so I thought I should check to see if The Good Dish is cleared there.

     

    Nope. Nothing. It's not airing at all here. WSHM's just replacing it with a simulcast of WGGB's 5 PM news.

  10. 1 hour ago, GoldenShine9 said:

     

    Does Nashville have a Spanish-language news operation? That could be a potential opportunity for WSMV to set up.

    Looking online, the only major Spanish station in the market is Univision affiliate WLLC-LD, which doesn't have an in-house news operation.

     

    Also, WSMV used to run Telemundo on its second digital subchannel, but dropped it in 2010.

  11. Update to the Hearst Media Production Group news: the Litton name is being retired, as HMPG becomes a unified producer for all Hearst-derived TV programming. Litton's website now redirects to a subpage on Hearst's site. Three Litton alumi are taking executive roles in the new subsidiary (founder Dave Morgan and CCO Peter Sniderman retired at the end of last year):

    • Former Litton CCO Bryan Curb is now executive vice president and general manager of E/I programming.
    • Angelica Rose McDaniel, formerly exectctive VP of strategy and creative development, will oversee entertainment.
    • Chris Matthews has been named CFO, more or less the same role he had before.
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  12. 49 minutes ago, kfc513 said:

     

     

    FOX has a news division that's been around since 1996, and they still don't have regular newscasts on its stations (besides Fox News Sunday). If Nexstar does buy The CW, I wouldn't expect them to have any regular news shows either, even with NewsNation as their sister division.

    Perhaps not regularly, but I can see them occasionally covering certain national events like elections and presidential addresses, like Fox does.

  13. 12 hours ago, SFTV said:

    If CBS is investing on launching WWJ….Throwing this out into the ring, they might as well invest in starting newscasts in the CW O&O group. I believe there’s only 3 in the group.
     

    - WUPA in Atlanta has a newscast produced by KTVT in Dallas.

     

    - KBCW only simulcasts KPIX 5’s 6am show, nothing at night.

     

    KSTW Seattle only does weather and sports casts produced by KPIX on social media (FB & Twitter,) not sure over the air.
     

    Interesting fact, the weather graphics/templates for CW11 that KPIX generates for them is from the First CBS O&O Graphics Package from 2010-2013 

     

     

    Assuming an upstart newscast on a CW station, especially one without a duopoly partner or even a news sharing agreement, doesn't just struggle against established players, if not get outright hash marks.

     

    Then again, that itself assumes that CBS even cares about competing rather than just making bank off political ads. Not to mention the decline of syndication in the face of streaming, which makes local programming (i.e. news) way more attractive than some flash in the pan talk show or reruns of sitcoms already on streaming services.

    • Like 2
  14. 21 minutes ago, noggi said:

     

    There's plenty of other options in town for local news at 11 on a Saturday. Why do the same thing with the same stories as your competitors? Why not try something different as a lead in to a popular network comedy sketch show?

     

    Local stations used to produce all kinds of programming... comedy, music, etc... why not go back to that? Why does a local station just have to purely be a news operation? If audiences and revenue are shrinking why is it such a bad idea to try something else?

    IMO, the idea of trying something different isn't the issue. If anything, I'd gladly welcome experimentation. I feel like local stations can produce more than just news and lifestyle shows, and making different kinds of programming would at least help stem the loss of viewers to streaming at least somewhat.

     

    That said, the implication I get from this new show is that it's basically gonna be a clone of The Daily Show; that is, a "comedic" retelling of current events while cracking a bunch of wheezy, stale political jokes done better elsewhere. That's not an experiment, that's just cheap and dumb.

     

    At least, that's just my guess. If I'm wrong, feel free to tell me. Believe me, I'd be happy to hear it.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using Local News Talk you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.