Leaderboard

CBS would go to WUPA as they own that station with the CW either going to a subchannel or to elsewhere.

I kinda wish Hearst would buy Meredith and pull a WIAT. I have followed Swann over the years and he would be better off doing talk radio. Less complications.

Not to be that guy but.... Google is your friend...

[MEDIA=twitter]862031979654598656[/MEDIA] and the open: [MEDIA=twitter]862036873991999488[/MEDIA]

I was going to say that maybe Rick just forgot the actual number of stations, just like he forgot which agencies he was going to cut. https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZCyTQEANlmM

Isn't that CNN now? Oh wait, CNN is trying to be "All First Take, All The Goddam Time..."

...if you know how to use it. Like Wikipedia it can be a STARTING POINT...

I'm surprised that something like that could still happen, even for smaller markets that they seemed to target, given how easy it would be to find so-called public figures and guests on social media, there's ways of finding out if people are legit even if they provide false details. It reminds me of when Sacha Baron Cohen got on some local news show in Mississippi as "Borat." The makers of the film supposedly gave the producer a fake PR website, but always double check with other sources (even back then, a simple Google search would have given him away). She ended up leaving the station after that, too, because her boss started second-guessing everything she did after that. For this, the fault lies with whoever at the station didn't do their proper research and just haphazardly booked them without second thought.

Hugh Hewitt has an "aww shucks" demeanor and is a Republican apologist through-and-through. I can't see any sort of intrinsic value to putting him on the lineup. MSNBC may use the "balance" argument, but that comes at risk of further alienating their existing progressive viewer base. Just... why...