channel2

Didn't Nexstar have a habit of getting rid of choppers after it bought stations anyway? They are/were at the forefront but I feel like station groups have been increasingly getting rid of the choppers...

Scripps has had some presence or another in Denver for more than a century (barring 2009 to 2011). KMGH wasn't just some random clunker they ended up being stuck with. They seemed to think Ion was another Food Network... I feel like the company that had the ingenuity to put HGTV on the air and fleece Belo out of the Food Network is basically gone. The current Scripps Networks is not particularly inventive like the previous iteration was.

Absolutely. History has shown that you can't necessarily count on the free market to always serve the public good.

Per the Lexington Herald-Leader, they firing all six of their news directors and replacing them with "local news content managers" who will receive guidance from a new "news operations manager" based at WTVQ, Russ Geller. It sounds like a more top-down, corporate-driven structure than what they're doing now.

KGWN is owned by Marquee, not Allen!

I think people forget that Graham isn't exactly some mom-and-pop shop. Graham Holdings is a diversified conglomerate and their TV stations are just one of their many businesses. And Graham Holdings is still headquartered in Washington.

LIN hasn't even existed in a fucking decade! Heartland must've been cheapasses too.

WSIL's market seems to have the Big Three affiliates all with their own turf. WSIL being Southern Illinois, WPSD being Kentucky, and KFVS being not only Missouri but the general "Five States" area. If that's the case then it's wild seeing WPSD aggressively pursuing those laid off from the "Illinois" station.

They were barely using it even when I grew up, which would've been the 2000s. Considering that a lot of the American flag iconography Gannett once drenched its stations in now seems to be the exclusive province of outfits like Fox News, I sadly don't blame them for ditching those trappings.

It sounds like it's akin to the CBS/Viacom split, where Sumner Redstone still controlled both - although he clearly favored Viacom, which kept the "sexier" Paramount Pictures, MTV Networks and BET, over CBS.

It's more than nothing!

They went international in the joint venture days and they still used the name! And look at Marvel parading Captain America throughout the world! I'm not keen on scrapping Syfy for a subordinate brand of USA.

USA is basically the general entertainment cable network, something that is considered a liability nowadays because streamers have eaten up much of their value proposition. But it's still one of the biggest cable networks and knowing that "USA Networks" has a history as a corporate moniker, I think using that for this company would be a good idea.

Why did they let Gray keep WYOW anyway? And isn't their application for a new Eagle River station going to complicate things? WKOW and its spawn seem to essentially be the sick men of their markets, although WXOW and WQOW at least cover both La Crosse and Eau Claire. I'm under the impression that WEAU and WKBT have long focused on Eau Claire and La Crosse near-exclusively.

Isn't West Lafayette also a place where they can scoop up lots of fresh-out-of-college kids to work at WLFI? Heartland seems to have been run on the cheap even before Allen absorbed it...

It's so wild to me to see USA described as a "smaller" network when it was one of the pillars of cable for decades and it wasn't even a decade ago that they still had big hits like Mr. Robot, to say nothing of the Netflix-fueled resurgence of Suits.

It's also a valuable domain name they wouldn't want to fall into the hands of a competitor. Especially since it's still a homophone!

Doesn't Gray own the "First Alert" brand? Can't they just revoke the licenses to competing stations when it's up?

Isn't WIBW the traditional powerhouse in Topeka? It'd be pretty sad if they just turned it into an extension of KCTV...

Nobody's ever said it outright but I'm pretty sure much of the reason USA ever put the Sci-Fi Channel on the air is because Kay Koplovitz loved the works of Arthur C. Clarke, and it just so happened that one of USA's corporate parents owned Star Trek and the other one a bunch of seminal horror movies. So of course they'd be willing to foot the $100 million bill that USA paid for a cash-strapped independent channel that had to keep delaying its launch! The thing about Syfy is that the domain name "scifi.com" still redirects to their site. Which I think hints at Syfy being an asset that somebody could do so much more with!

Syfy really seems like a hidden gem to me, even though its audience was among the first to ditch linear TV. The name change being a perceived middle finger to the audience didn't help!

Comcast is an MVPD! Having channels that have no traction and no growth potential is an active drain on their business. The subscriber fees they were paying NBC Universal when they didn't yet own it stay within the company now, so those channels remain viable only as long as advertisers and other MVPDs want to pay for them. Other than NBCSN, most of the channels they axed suffered from low or declining distribution. WBD and Paramount don't have an MVPD's infrastructure to worry about, and channels that have no apparent reason to exist can just toddle along by soaking up sub fees until the MVPDs force the issue. I'm surprised they haven't already, Disney's shocking concession to Charter aside. Isn't Sky News bound up in the infrastructure of Sky? It sounds like something they'd prefer not to separate.

I think Bravo is more popular than people here realize. The Real Housewives franchise, and the rest of their programming, holds a very strong appeal with a demographic advertisers love - and one that I suspect has little if any overlap with that of this board. Bravo plays a big role with Peacock as well. Sci Fi/Syfy has always been a bit of an outlier in the NBC Universal stable. Unlike USA, Bravo or Oxygen (pre-true crime revamp), it's overtly dedicated to a category, not a demographic. It strikes me as a hidden gem that could excel in the right hands but I don't think NBCU cares about it anymore.

Isn't it also being threatened by sea level rise?

Households can have more than one person in them.