MediaZone4K

This! Would it kill MSNBC to take a break from Trump for more than a few minutes to focus on other issues in the country/world. As bad as Fox News is it's breaking news component is significantly better than MSNBC's. That was surprising from NBC. Granted it is okay to offer the public alternatives. In the past, I've literally had viewers calling to the station to complain about constant General Hospital preemptions due to special reports. But from a news competition standpoint it did look bad that NBC was the only one not on the air for Carter until about 4:00. I was wondering if it was just my local affiliate not taking the coverage until I went online and saw NBC News now was basically the same. Yes! I would think they'd streaming to bolster access to Today on the internet in order to boost their audience. Then again do CBS or ABC stream CBS Mornings or GMA?

Correction noted

In all fairness to you, we all criticize shows etc on this message board that we don't like. Yes, everything is not for everybody but we are all free to point out things about a show that we think are not good. The View sustains an audience which justifies its expansion from a ratings and financial standpoint, but I totally understand your frustration with the show. It devolved from a show about multigenerational women discussing life and current events, to middle-aged women parroting/arguing over one sided political talking points while hiring an outrageous conservative to gang up on. But as others appointed out we are free to not watch.

NBC was also pretty late coming into Jimmy Carter's *lying in state* coverage with a special report. NBC News now was just running it as a headline but not doing full-blown coverage until a Special Report at about 4:00 p.m. Eastern. In all fairness ABC and CBS were covering it, so there were options, but it was still surprising. Overall fantastic and compelling coverage from all stations especially KTTV and KABC. This is more dramatic than any hurricane coverage I've ever seen.

So Rosanna isn't even trying to hold up the guise of an objective journalist....not that she's good at hiding her opinions anyway. But from her days with Greg Kelly it was very obvious -- even though not explicitly stated -- that they were Trump supporters. Thats fine for FNC but not for the local broadcasts which already live in the shadow of the "Mother Ship's" bias.

Kttv also had pretty good dramatic pictures of a medical facility evacuation. Dare I say it was concerning how up close and personal some of the Fox 11 reporters were to the fire, especially the interview one of the reporters did with two people who tried to evacuate a horse.

I have a love affair with the Miami News Market but I finally took some time to investigate the history of its overlapping neighbor West Palm Beach. I was surprised to learn that WPBF only launched in 1989, and I liked their '90s newscasts which were modeled after World News Tonight. I really liked the walking around newsroom shots. It's Especially cool that the station still uses a newsroom set to this day which looks very similar to this.

2025 is pulling out all the punches just 7 days into the new year!!

Full circle.... McSweeny is retiring months before his former WTEN colleague Steve Caporizzo retires... Which you also mentioned. Glitch...

Disreguard.

Totally agree. Similarly, I used to wonder why networks would fly reporters out, when they can just do exactly this, use coverage from a local station, or have a local station do a package for them. Aside from telling the story their own way, I suppose its it's also about quality control. The fear that a green mid market reporter might not be as smooth in delivery. Admittedly I saw that in one of the live shots. Regardless, the crew did excellent, it was compelling coverage, and people get smoother over time.

WAGA's Alex Whittler announced on IG that she was promoted to host of Good Day ATL replacing Sharon Lawson who left last year "for her own well being". Im never up that early so not sure if GD ATL has a separate team for 4:30-7AM. But quite the load as she will also continue anchoring the hour long noon newscast. Originally she anchored just the noon.

Was thinking that too, but I saw David and Sandra together which threw me off.

WABC put together a pretty comprehensive half hour special on congestion pricing. I presume this aired at either 12:30 or 4:30 p.m. on a weekday? https://youtu.be/QJ1HcUEtJco?si=mzpRCOA63_DDpkwm

Thanks! TV was muted at work, so didn't hear that part. This has been pretty interesting year for breaking news happening on an off day. The Trump assassination attempts and Biden dropping out all happening on the weekend now this on the national holiday.

It's always interesting to see how networks function on national holidays/presumably low staffing days. GMA, Today, and CBS Mornings are typically pre-recorded on Christmas and New Year's. As such, none of the primary anchors were live in the building this morning. Hallie Jackson anchored coverage as a special report for the New Orleans terror attack. It was pretty cool to see them take WDSU's coverage. IDK if this was holiday staffing related. Looks like CBS did something similar. *Adding better pic

It's always interesting to see how networks function on low staffing days. GMA, Today, and CMs are typically pre-recorded on Christmas and New Year's. As such none of the primary anchors were live in the building this morning. *Morgan Norwood and Aaron Katerski anchored coverage as a special report this morning for the New Orleans terror attack. It was also pretty cool to see them take a mid-market local affiliate reporter on the ground versus their own network talent. Hopefully this terrible event is not an indication of how the rest of 2025 is going to go.

Imagine 9/11 being your first day at your new newsroom as a journalist!!!! What a story to tell. RIP Mr. Brown

Agreed. To put things in perspective, do we really need to be arguing about something as arbitrary as news anchor vacation time. IMO No.

Never said that. That first statement is exactly your attitude. "Any statement any non-executives makes is invalid, and any question of change makes you a fossil." Change for change sake is just different. It doesn't necessarily progress things. It's just different. I will never say let's do it this way because this is the way we've always done it, or I will never advocate for doing something just because journalism school says you have to. So stop there. If you're going to change things up there should be a legitimate reason, And it should be for the better. How does saying that staff deserves Christmas off and it might not make sense to air all newscasts on a slow news day advocating for a bygone era? That's very much current. You have a habit of speaking in absolutes.."Nobody is just burning the bosses’ money for kicks and giggles.".... How are you so sure? I'm guessing most of us here aren't in the corporate boardrooms. Does that mean we have no right to comment on and analyze certain situations in media? If you think people outside the office shouldn't be critiquing what's going on inside then why are you on this website? I don't know if you have ever actually worked in media because I have and I can tell you it doesn't make sense to bootlick for people who wouldn't hesitate to terminate you if it meant maximizing shareholder gains. To avoid a back and forth before the moderators step-in, people deserve time off for Christmas, it's not a sin to reduce your news output on a national holiday, and hesitate to comment on anything I post if your answer is just "the bosses know best, dont question, just comply." I don't even see why staff getting time off on Christmas is a debatable subject. But Ill close my part in that discussion here.

It's a fact. All you ever do is just find a way to contradict/dismiss what people say and advocate for station management. Your answer right now shows a lack of self-reflection. You think legitimate critiques of the way our collapsing industry is being run is "finding imaginary fault". Most of your answers on this thread are chalked up to "the people in charge have all the answers and we should just accept anything because they know best." What is the point of this website if not to critique decisions and offer alternatives? Exactly.

The were okay but I found the previous 2003 package and the following 2012 package to be stronger.

Today Show 60th Anniversary 2012, full 4 hours

Because management always makes the right decision and wasteful spending never happens. Contrarian and corporate apologist per usual.

Objectively speaking....Why pay staff time and a half to produce a full schedule of newscasts when little *LOCAL* news is actually occuring, for probably below average viewership? Is there an appetite to hear about the latest shooting/stabbing on Christmas? And from a subjective POV....What little does someone have going on in their life that they're mad about not being able to watch as much news for one day out of 366? Does any of this actually warrant debate? A major national holiday occurred, and mass amounts non-emergency workers scheduled vacation simultaneously. Its that simple. Anyway this sums it all up...