oklahomanewsman 210 Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 I feel sorry for St. Louis fans because the Task Force (that was appointed by Missouri Governor Jay Nixon) did everything they were instructed to do by the NFL and yet they still end up losing their team. I'll still watch the NFL because I love the game of football but I really don't blame the fans of St. Louis for wanting to boycott the NFL. What Roger Goodell did to STL fans was wrong. I lost some respect for Goodell because of that. Also if you look at Stan Kroenke's teams they're not only doing terrible on the field and on the rink and on the court and on the soccer field but also in attendance the Rams, Nuggets and Avalanche were all near the bottom of their respective leagues (NFL, NBA and NHL) in attendance and if Stan is going to win over LA fans he better get his act together and start putting a winning team on the field.
brianpr3 178 Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 heck it would be much better that the owners listen to the people and fire roger goodell.
24994J 5630 Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Until they start losing money, Goodell stays put. Besides, he's a nice scapegoat for most/all of the league's problems.
ABC 7 Denver 1729 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 The Raiders are moving to Las Vegas. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25466785/potential-raiders-stadium-in-las-vegas-would-practically-be-on-the-strip
TVNewsLover 787 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 The Raiders are moving to Las Vegas. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25466785/potential-raiders-stadium-in-las-vegas-would-practically-be-on-the-strip The Raiders are EXPLORING moving to Las Vegas. Nothing definite, far from it.
24994J 5630 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 The Raiders are moving to Las Vegas. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25466785/potential-raiders-stadium-in-las-vegas-would-practically-be-on-the-strip Where on earth does it say that? Nowhere, that's where.
ABC 7 Denver 1729 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 Where on earth does it say that? Nowhere, that's where. Do you think that by site proposal they don't mean Vegas?
24994J 5630 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 Do you think that by site proposal they don't mean Vegas? Do they want to move there? Maybe. Is anything official? No.
TexasTVNews 1378 Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 There so many Raiders fans out in San Antone want to see the team move to the Alamo City. http://www.kens5.com/story/sports/2016/01/30/texas-raider-nation-shows-support-franchise-move-san-antonio/79584506/
Guest Former Member 207 Posted October 13, 2016 Posted October 13, 2016 It's an old thread, I know, but it seems like the Raiders' move to Las Vegas may gradually become reality, as the Nevada Senate passed a 16-5 vote on providing $750 million in funding towards a new stadium. The Nevada state assembly would still have to review and vote for their side of the proposal, which won't take place until sometime today, after the Yom Kippur observation. Of course, there's also the other hurdle of getting the owners' vote (which requires a minimum of 24 votes). Oakland, of course, is still trying anything they can to keep the Raiders in town, but it's already been made pretty clear here in California (with a couple of recent exceptions), public money towards stadium/arena construction is a "no-go". https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/10/12/raiders-move-to-las-vegas-passes-its-first-big-hurdle/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.