mer764KCTV5

I do hope NBC would move it to WALA-TV, just so they would have an nice little reunion with NBC after 2 and a half decades of being an Fox Affiliate. (Of course, with Fox being on 10.1)

Why was under different circumstances? Well, because, Sinclair tried to aquire Tribune Broadcasting but failed.

WNBW. Not WGFL.

Even the Boston Celtics cared for the station more. Also, why did Fox even sell off WFXT, just to get KTVU? They could've owned KTVU and KICU.... and have the Boston station as well. It's like how Fox regained WITI in 2020. Like I know they wanted to aquire KCPQ.

It shows even Fox hates the Fox News Channel.

*2018 repeats again.* But no seriously on this one, and I'm being serious, this crap is going to kill the good reputation of a boat-load of Sinclair-owned stations. The situation in 2018 was bad enough, given Sinclair was trying to aquire Tribune Broadcasting/Media, but did Sinclair have to do this in 2024, an presidential election year?

This was mentioned as a topic over in the 'Nexstar Aquires 75% of The CW' thread until it got locked.

Okay, I can't look at the full thing because, Twitter/X is just plain ol' annoying. But that gotta break some standards.

My Fox Station and former O&O WDAF-TV (Channel 4) in Kasnas City, have been in the same building since 1949, and it's in pretty good condition.

That's probably what I was meaning, they used the some of the space from KUHT. I didn't say anything that Channel 8 did anything else other than give the allow to the studios.

When KHOU's studios flooded, it actually used some of the space from KUHT in the Melcher Center for Public Broadcasting until KHOU got new studios in 2019 because Channel 11's previous/flooded studios was inundated and wasn't available.

Wow, they really did change. I doesn't look like an New York Clear-Channel Television station anymore.

Yeet that man's broadcast license. But no seriously, the fact that he doesn't allow WADL-TV to be an major factor due to greed to the point he threw away an WHOLE $75 Million offer from Mission Broadcasting exactly explains what type of person he is. That and making WFDF (The other broadcast NON-Cable/Television property he owns) from an African-American focused talk station which could compete against iHeartMedia-owned Black Infomation Network and WDFN, BIN's Detroit Affiliate, to just an ordinary conservative talk station, which is really dumb since they have to compete with WDTK (albeit the signal is better on WFDF than on WDTK) and WJR. WJR is literally an Clear-Channel Station. On 760AM. WJR's signal is protected—by the Federal Communications Commission—at Night-time. WFDF have to also compete with an clear-channel station. Seriously, Adell?? Also, I probably think that racketeering is an felony, so there's a chance he might lose WFDF and WADL-TV. (Also, the article doesn't mention his ownership to WADL-TV)

Doing an small bump to remind Y'all that the deal to sell WJMN-TV outta Escanaba–Marquette, Michigan has been approved by the FCC. (Check the Michigan section.)

I wonder what KCTV5 would be doing on their 5.3 subchannel since This TV is gone.

Oh my bad, thought it was an change in Louisville, KY.

?? WLKY is an Hearst station. Do you mean WAVE3?

Hello, it was me that did that. The reason was to explain that if ANY stations (in this case, KSHB) tries to put an 9pm newscast, it will get beaten by WDAF-TV. But yea, this seems boring...

Despite the fact KMBC is the market leader, WDAF is considered an strong 2nd place, with the 9pm timeslot being considered an leader due to the longevity (WDAF started an prime-time newscast in 1994)

Locally in Kansas City, if any and I will repeat this literally ANY Television station tries to put an 9pm newscast on thier main channel or if they are in a duopoly, the secondary channel, it WILL get defeated by WDAF-TV (A FOX AFFILIATE) because Channel 4 just have the experience with an 9pm newscast SINCE 1994. It doesn't even care if it's Channel 9, 5, or 41, it will lose against Channel 4. That's an local, but important example why the Plan B wouldn't be an More News situation.

The fact they introduced it while in a police chase is so Los Angeles. Also, that graphics are really AMAZING.

I'm thinking about how the Fox O&O Stations would put it. I mean, because of the fact they have GMFB.

Huh, it's weird that they wouldn't re-acquire WDAF.

So Fox could've literally took the affiliation away from WDAF?

Did they ever think about the consequences when they tried to aquire WDAF-TV in Kansas City, WJW in Cleveland, and the rest of the Tribune Media stations? Nope. They never did anything to think about the consequences about what they did or the consequences. I don't think they would ever EVEN thought about cashing in years ago.