CircleSeven 1960 Posted November 18, 2013 Posted November 18, 2013 TVNewsCheck reports this morning that The Washington Post Company will change its name to Graham Holdings Company. The name change will go in effect on November 29th. The company will continue to comprise its by its major holdings, broadcast division, Post-Newsweek Stations, cable provider Cable One, Inc., educational institute, Kaplan, Inc., and other related holdings. I wouldn't mind they changing the outdated PNS name to "Graham Stations". That would've made tons of sense. But they might want to keep that familiar name.
Big Country News 435 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 But they might want to keep that familiar name. Familiar to who? The only way anybody, besides us, would know is if they watch the 2 second P-NW lower third tag.
sanewsguy 514 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Familiar to who? The only way anybody, besides us, would know is if they watch the 2 second P-NW lower third tag. It's not even there anymore. They dumped it last year. Just a generic local copyright now. (ex ©2013 KSAT -- SAN ANTONIO).
Viper550 292 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Their logo was on the endcap though (with a cute 3D effect too) But why not Graham Broadcasting? It has a good ring to it...
Breaking News 835 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Why not just call it The Washington Post Company.. [© 2013 WDIV-TV Detroit A Subsidiary of Washington Post Company]
channel2 982 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Because they no longer own the Washington Post.
Mrtraveler01 738 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 TVNewsCheck reports this morning that The Washington Post Company will change its name to Graham Holdings Company. The name change will go in effect on November 29th. The company will continue to comprise its by its major holdings, broadcast division, Post-Newsweek Stations, cable provider Cable One, Inc., educational institute, Kaplan, Inc., and other related holdings. I wouldn't mind they changing the outdated PNS name to "Graham Stations". That would've made tons of sense. But they might want to keep that familiar name. I didn't know they also run Cable One. That makes me think less of them now.
groupwfan 97 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Why not just call it The Washington Post Company.. [© 2013 WDIV-TV Detroit A Subsidiary of Washington Post Company] Or maybe: [Local4News] © 2013 Graham Holdings Company of Michigan (WDIV-TV) All Rights Reserved
hathawaynson2 39 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 Here's an example: ©2013 , Graham Holdings Company (WPLG or KSAT) all rights reserved.
Rusty Muck 4390 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 It's not even there anymore. They dumped it last year. Just a generic local copyright now. (ex ©2013 KSAT -- SAN ANTONIO). If they are doing that for KSAT's copyright notices, then just extend it to all the PNS stations. Boom. Problem solved. Honestly, Post-Newsweek should have been excised years ago, but obviously Sidney Harman and Tina Brown (Newsweek) and Jeff Bezos (Post) never thought of, or bothered to, put in a clause in their purchases where the Graham family had to phase out the name.
sanewsguy 514 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 If they are doing that for KSAT's copyright notices, then just extend it to all the PNS stations. Boom. Problem solved. Honestly, Post-Newsweek should have been excised years ago, but obviously Sidney Harman and Tina Brown (Newsweek) and Jeff Bezos (Post) never thought of, or bothered to, put in a clause in their purchases where the Graham family had to phase out the name. They did extend it to all the stations, see this topic from December 2012.
Rusty Muck 4390 Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 They did extend it to all the stations' date=' see this topic from December 2012. Derp, I completely forgot about that. **facepalm**
CircleSeven 1960 Posted July 28, 2014 Author Posted July 28, 2014 Bumping this thread because Graham Holdings has FINALLY ditched the "Post-Newsweek Stations" name. They should've done this on the day they changed the name from WaPo Co. to GHC. TVNewsCheck stated that their broadcast division is now called Graham Media Group.
channel2 982 Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Having checked the subpage on GHC's site, it looks like WJXT has decided to fix what isn't broken.
24994J 5619 Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I think the logo designers of the world are running out of ideas, because when I see the new Graham logo, all I see is this...
channel2 982 Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I think it's supposed to look like the power symbol, which was a big thing in logo design several years ago.
DirtyHarry 727 Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Bumping this thread because Graham Holdings has FINALLY ditched the "Post-Newsweek Stations" name. They should've done this on the day they changed the name from WaPo Co. to GHC. TVNewsCheck stated that their broadcast division is now called Graham Media Group. What's with all the crappy looking logos these days. Reminds me a little bit of General Cinema Theaters:
Breaking News 835 Posted July 29, 2014 Posted July 29, 2014 What's with all the crappy looking logos these days. Reminds me a little bit of General Cinema Theaters: Too funny LOL, but true though... Here the logo copy from mediabistro http://www.mediabistro.com/tvspy/post-newsweek-name-retired-company-now-graham-media-group_b125603
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.