60 Minutes in the age of Trump 2.0

[abric 191]

In the end, Paramount Global didn’t settle because they were wrong. They didn’t settle because it was fair. They settled because that’s how power works now. Grease the right palms, press the right flesh, and you can say whatever the hell you want—as long as you don’t mean it. In the end, they sold out the truth for 16 million bucks.

 

... that’s a hell of a bargain.

[HanSolo 210]

9 hours ago, Amra said:

Evening News not happy about it.

Good for them for not bending the knee. 

[mre29 1592]

Quote

The agreement in principle, proposed by a mediator, includes plaintiffs’ fees and costs and — except for fees and costs — will be allocated to Trump’s future presidential library, Paramount Global said in a statement late Tuesday.

 

Trump's "presidential library"? 

 

Quote

Paramount also said it agreed that in the future, “60 Minutes” will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after the interviews have aired, “subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns.”

 

Transcripts aren't good enough. The complete, uncut interview should also be made available for viewing,. I mean, do you think average voters are going to interested in reading a transcript when there's a video to watch?

 

In fact, the complete, uncut interview with Harris should be made available now.

 

[MediaZone4K 2324]

11 minutes ago, mre29 said:

 

Trump's "presidential library"? 

 

 

Transcripts aren't good enough. The complete, uncut interview should also be made available for viewing,. I mean, do you think average voters are going to interested in reading a transcript when there's a video to watch?

 

In fact, the complete, uncut interview with Harris should be made available now.

 

 

[mre29 1592]

Smart of them to think ahead. Now CBS needs to heavily plug that video in their own coverage of this.