Leaderboard

Hello everyone, I'm sure many of you are wondering what's been going on with the site for the last couple weeks. While I don't even have all the answers, I figured it'd be useful to explain a bit about what happened and where we're going from here. First, a little history. I have never been in control of the tvnewstalk.net domain. Many years ago (we're talking like, at least 10 years back,) I ultimately inherited the responsibility of operating the site while a former administrator owned the domain. This, generally, was uneventful, except for a few instances where the domain registration lapsed and I had to poke them to get it renewed. This just kind of became the way things were, ownership of the domain never really came up, and slowly they stopped coming around the community. Fast forward to 2024, when in late February/early March, anyone trying to visit the site via tvnewstalk.net was greeted with a page reading "Account Suspended". As far as I know, this was the "old" server (that was still operational, serving only to redirect visits to tvnewstalk.net to forums.tvnewstalk.net) going unpaid. Since the DNS for the domain still pointed forums.tvnewstalk.net to the server I control, the site stayed online and accessible. This issue had happened before, and to my recollection, resolved itself without me having to alert anybody. I was also getting quite busy with work, so I chose to just let it go. Since everything had forever been at forums.tvnewstalk.net, impacts on traffic from the redirect not working were extremely minor. At the end of March, another problem arose. TVNewsTalk.net dropped off the Domain Name System. My assumption is this is related to the earlier "Account Suspended" issue, I guess the domain was registered through the host, and they removed it from their DNS when the bill (presumably) went unpaid. For most users, access to TVNT was cut off. This, however, happened slowly, as DNS servers took some time to update to process the removal. At least until a few days ago, we were still seeing people using the site via T-Mobile. When the domain dropped off DNS, I reached out to another one of our former administrators, who I had gone through the last time I had to contact the domain owner. They attempted to make contact, and got no response. There was beginning to be a lot of noise in the community wondering what happened to the site, and there was even some sort of unauthorized crowdfunding campaign spun up. It was at this point I decided to take matters into my own hands, registered LocalNewsTalk.net, and began the process of moving the forum over. That's where we're at now. The site has been transferred over. There are still a few loose ends to tie up, but otherwise we're back in action. I do not know what will become of the TVNewsTalk.net domain that we've called home for almost 20 years. Perhaps it will return, some day, but for the foreseeable future, we're going to be here at localnewstalk.net. Things still being worked on: Email (Registration, Password Resets): Email has been changed over to the localnewstalk.net domain and should be working as intended. Check spam folder if you don't see an expected message. Google Login: Changes submitted for review by Google Trust and Safety. Might be working. Facebook Login: In Progress. Need to complete extra steps to re-enable this. Discord Login: Should be working. Forum Theme: There are a small handful of broken things due to an update I ran while the site was unavailable. Please feel free to leave any questions or concerns you may have below. -Weeters

It wasn’t a gesture. It was a Nazi salute. Let’s call it what it was.

This week every news organization is going to have an abnormal schedule. It's the holidays. It's expected. We go through this every year and seem to begrudge people for taking time off during the holidays and...no. Just enjoy different people getting on the air. Some of them REALLY need it after the abuse some of them have had to deal with this year from the public, politicians and c-suiters pushing them to their last nerve. Live with your ABC station not having news on Wednesday because of the NBA being on all day and get over that your local station doesn't have your precious morning news and advertorial show on that morning and instead runs a mass, some bargain-bin Christmas film from Trifecta, or a taped parade. I feel like I have to say this every year and it's tiring. People deserve time off.

Let us all review something we have heard James Spann say over the years: Know your landmarks. Most people will not remember many roads, unless you drive them or they are a major one, like an interstate. What does Spann always do? Name off places people know: schools, churches, BBQ restaurants, that one gentlemen’s club one time. Here in Evansville, many of the Mets will say a number of the schools, major businesses, the airport. If a tornado is on the ground in a rural area, someone at TWC might say, “It’s in a rural area, not much to worry about.” Someone local will say, “This is on the ground just one mile west of XYZ High School.” Yes, we have a number of schools in corn fields around here. Our Doppler radar sits in the middle of a corn field. Everyone here knows if that radar goes down, we lose data that can help save and protect lives and property. Nothing against the folks at TWC, they are great people, but they shouldn’t be doing something this local.

So, I actually think there might be something here. Maybe. It's a hunch. Maybe I'm wrong! But, allow me to speculate for a moment. WSVN is in a very unique situation right now. They have plans to build a brand new facility, and their current owners are developing the real estate for both the current facility and the future one. They own the land at both sites, in fact, the future facility is on empty land they've held for years, and the current facility is on land they want to develop into expensive condos. The condo development wouldn't be planned if they didn't think it would make money, and it will probably make enough to pay for the new WSVN facility several times over. This whole new facility project has always had the underlying motive of Sunbeam wanting the station off the current land because they see the value in it, and they have a lot of empty land in Miramar that they can plop it on, to get it out of the way. The common saying is "Disney doesn't buy stations", but there should be an asterisk there. Disney doesn't buy stations because Bob Iger is convinced most are overpriced. Sunbeam has a very interesting position here. Their primary business is, at this point, property development. Building a building just to lease it out is what they do. It seems to me, like they could be in a position to sell WSVN at a "discount", with the remainder being more or less made up via a long-term lease on the new facility. This would be a huge win for Sunbeam. They can develop land that has sat idle for years, and have it immediately start making money, from a tenant that you really wouldn't have to worry about going bankrupt. They'd still make money off the station for years to come, and best of all, it'd be a predictable amount. It is notable that, despite the project being announced some time ago, the parcel the new facility will sit on was untouched as late as October of last year, over a year after it was announced and approved by the city. What's the delay? The fact we're hearing about this now means there's probably been talks about this for months. I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that Sunbeam put the brakes on the project in order to provide the ability to any possible future owner (I think FOX is also in play here) to make changes before the construction begins. I'm not sure we're done hearing about this "deal"... I don't think Disney would settle for a .2, if there weren't other things in the works. I've been saying since the new facility was announced that this seems ripe for them to sell the station and make money off the lease, and this seems to be the perfect opportunity to do so.

According to the NY Post, the ‘stodgy’ new CBS Evening News anchors received a modest viewership bump for their premier. The broadcast had 5.2 million viewers, a +14% spike from Norah's 2024 average. What I find laughable is the article's extremely negative viewpoint. (I'm laughing, but I'm not surprised because this is the Post, after all) My favorite quote is from the nameless former TV executive who doesn't think "audiences have the capacity to absorb a reporting-led show with lots of segments." Yes, our attention spans have shortened, but not everyone needs the news to be quick hits served with extra flash like Entertainment Tonight. That show has the attention span of a fly. Not bashing ET. There's a place for that, and there's a place for the new CBS Evening News. It is hilarious that people say, "Try something different to stand out," and then, when someone does that, they get bashed for not looking like everyone else. If you want a typical newscast, two broadcast networks offer typical news of the day presentation.

Somebody DM a moderator if actual news happens regarding any of the affiliations in question, and we'll reopen this thread. In the meantime, let's cool off after all this bickering.

Since the ICE raids started days before and there were no new substantive developments; I agree with them that it didn't warrant much more than a mention. And the following day, they presented a more comprehensive piece regarding the raids. I appreciate their measured approach when it comes to 'the news of the day.' Giving viewers the same tired rundown of stories, just like everyone else, hasn't worked. If there was ever a time to re-invent the wheel, it's now. I'm not sure they will ever be #1 (or even #2), but they're fully capable of being the most competitive #3 there is. The question is, will that be enough for them???

I agree. Begin the show with that daily news roundup, but instead extend it to 90 second VOs or VO/SOTs for the first 2-5 mins, then get into feature reporting for the remainder. If CBS torches their best revamp of EN since Bob Schiffer, that would be very unfortunate. To the critics: Every news outlet covers the same thing, it's not a sin that CBS decided to go in a different direction. I really hope the audience gives this a chance. It's a jolting transition because we've been hardwired to fast paced high story count newscasts like the competition. But this is a level of quality rare for American TV news that we'd more see from PBS or Europeran sources like BBC and France 24. I hope people will open their minds to this. If this crashes and burns, I don't think the evening news can get much better than this. Just give the timeslot back to the affiliates.

Ryan Field posted picture of the new set.

So basically, she was perfect for that show.

For all intents and purposes, stations that show MNT are essentially Independents.

A bit, I watched This Morning recently and there was a panel at 5 in the morning, seriously? I just woke up, I want the headlines not some talking heads talking about the same stories that I knew when I went to bed, and I think thats the problem with the weekday This Morning, it's too stiff, too political.

I think the hyper-fixation on brand and music changes being some kind of driver for viewers to "get upset" and stop watching the station is kind of absurd, when you consider all the other things that can change in a TV news broadcast that the station really doesn't have much control over. Talent is a more important draw for viewers than music and brands, and retirements don't often move the ratings needle much. WPVI didn't see a massive ratings drop after Jim Gardner left, despite his status in the market. The same is looking true at WGN after Tom Skilling left, and I can't imagine a music change or branding would actually lead people to change the channel permanently. It's not 1996 anymore. I'd also like to point out that a lot of these old 90's era "people were MAD!!!" claims come from newspaper columnists at the time. We cannot know for certain what they embellished on to make their column more interesting. "People were upset" that a station changed their branding the same way people get upset that Judge Judy was interrupted for severe weather. This doesn't mean the whole market was "rioting in the streets" like people around these parts like to think would happen if WPVI modernized MCTYW. On that subject, the 1996 orchestral MCTYW was arguably just bad and was an abrupt, noticeable change. WPVI has been using new cuts of MCTYW from different composers for years at this point (there have been some new ones since the graphics debut!) and I have a hunch nobody but people involved with this community have noticed, largely because they don't sound as wildly different as the orchestral package did.

General reminder that the "Action News" trademark is owned by Cox (and "Eyewitness News" is owned by CBS!) and stations have to pay to use them. Why should Scripps keep paying for a brand name for a format that hasn't been properly used in decades? I know folks have a weird affinity for these two brands, but come on. This is, by far, a better logo than some of the other Scripps rebrands over the past few years. Why should they pay Cox for this name? Why should they pay Nexstar for The CW? These are all competitors. People love to think talent at these stations treat each other like this is Anchorman, and while that's not true, there's no good reason to give your competition money for a tired old brand or a second-rate network affiliation.

This is what happens always. The viewers always yell "gee we want a quality newscast". You give them an excellent broadcast and then they are like "lol sike not like that".

Something I realized reading this is that this is really kind of the first complete building in NYC built for television (at this scale at least.) ABC's current facility is a mishmash of buildings, including one over 100 years old and formerly used as a horse riding facility (similar to WBBM's old facility.) NBC is in old radio studios, CBS is in an old dairy, WNYW is in an old opera house. WPIX is in an office tower. ABC had no real constraints designing the studio spaces here. This is about as good as it can get in NYC.

If this turns out to be a correct prediction, and history suggests it likely will be, you gotta give it to Hearst for taking things in steps instead of blowing the whole thing up at once. Methodical and calculated.

Sadly there is a segment of the population that eat this stuff up, no matter how most of us feel. The good news, most don't know where to even find the station. Doe it even register in terms of ratings? The bad news, it is a bubble, reinforcing what folks want to hear and believe. Something all media is becoming.

I saw it on X/Twitter, I don't know if we can trust it. But it looks like this is going to be the new set for the CBS Evening News

Liz Cho anchored at noon today, for the one person here who seems to be obsessed with her subbing schedule and feels she should work more.

When the CBS Evening News opens up every 3-6 years, it's always 'what about Anderson?' When there's an opening for a serious, veteran anchor at local or national, it's often 'what about Shepard?' When there's an opportunity for a morning show anchor, it's constantly 'what about Robin?' From CBS, CNN, NewsNation, large market Fox stations, even to freaking Jeopardy!, you spend long enough around here, and seeing the same names listed over and over like they're waiting in line at an employment agency goes from eye roll-inducing to annoying to hilarious.

It always never fails to see certain people in this fandom bleat the age old cry that mOaR lOcAl nEwS is what the marketplace needs. Sure, let's divvy up a shrinking pie of TV viewers even further while overstretching existing personnel to do more work for less pay and merely rehashing the same content with the same McStation graphics and same unimaginative cuts from another generic Stephen Arnold music package. YAWN. Here's a news flash: if either big three network pulls out of programming the 10pm hour, that's nothing but a devastingly dire outlook for the entire industry. It means that local television is in trouble and in an unsustainable path to insolvency unless you implement the Scrippscast model (or even the Rogers CityNews model) across-the-board or utilize AI to do everything for less. But then again, it's not the first time the TV fandom has been so utterly detached from reality.

Here are a couple of the opens: …and I get what @NYCshorty said, the graphics and open style would fit as a Fox O&O package, as components of it blend better with the network’s current graphics style than the actual O&O package does.

The new set debuts at 4pm today, and it is the KCAL set.

Former anchor Jeff Vaughn is suing CBS, citing “anti-white discrimination”

Thank you for bringing us back! Even though I"m done with TV (for now), this site is still a daily one for me to keep up with what's going on in the crazy world of TV.

ABC being relegated to subchannel-only status in Miami of all places sounds like the biggest lateral move ever.

Virtual weather studio for CNN. Looks like an Apple Store.

And first on this forum: previews of what I’m told is the new WABC studio. You can see the 7 logo hanging above the desk.

99.99% of what he posts is negative about something. Lord knows who actually said what. Most of the feedback seems to be positive. It's a different approach and it stands out. Will there be changes and adjustments? Im sure there will be. But it stands out from the rest and that is what they're going for

Maurice and John were indeed at the desk together; they're not alternating anchor duties. Margaret Brennan led with the first story, providing a mix of reporting and analysis. With two male anchors, which networks and cable have avoided for several decades at this point, it's not a surprise that they would feature her in a prominent role. Good balance. The first block featured two packages: one on Deep Seek and one on an espionage story. They're essentially doing the opposite of what WNT and NN have done. Instead of shortening packages and squeezing in as many stories as they can, they're covering fewer stories, their packages are much longer, and most are followed by extended talk-backs between both anchors and the correspondent. The first two packages were followed by a fast-paced "Round Up" reading of the day's headlines, and then the first commercial break. During the first commercial break, they displayed headlines and kept a dynamic live shot of the anchors during the commercial break. The latter, in particular, was a pretty cool concept. Was able to grab a quick pic (attached). This didn't continue in the subsequent commercial breaks, though. And there's probably a better use for the lower left corner than showing temperatures around the world. Maybe sports scores, stock market closing numbers, sunsets from U.S. cities, or an image corresponding to the headline to the right. The show ended with both anchors giving a commentary on the bravery of firefighters across the country. This show isn't going to beat ABC or NBC, but maybe it'll beat previously iterations of CBSEN. It seems like a solid product and, with fewer stories and correspondents, it's probably cheaper to produce.

And it looks like it debuted in 2010..... Can't wait to see when the next one in 2056, sources that's when the new graphics will debut!

Many choose to keep their private business just that: private. They are under no obligation to make public disclosures. We should respect that.

I think people in general are just tired of the "all Trump, all the time" monomania on these networks. It's been almost a decade of the same topics on a loop. It makes it that much harder for them to compete with YouTube, Twitch, podcasts, social media, etc. where there's actual choices, not the same programming over and over again.

Am I the only one who watched the interview? Tony didn't suggest that Palestinians shouldn't exist; that's a ridiculous thing to post. There was no disrespect from Tony. His questions were certainly direct but were asked with a calm voice and a clear invitation for Coates to respond openly. Have any of you lobbing criticism at Tony actually read Coates' book? Coates explained that he wrote about the Israel-Gaza conflict exclusively through the lens of the plight of the Palestinians and did not at all discuss the Israeli perspective or the violence they've endured because he felt the Israeli perspective was widely covered elsewhere in media. So of course it's fair game for a journalist to ask why he chose to do that and the potential implications of that. If you write controversial or one-sided points of view in a book and go on a hard news network's morning show to discuss it, you should expect pointed questions about those views. This is the network of 60 Minutes; not People Magazine.

Will Lonnie Quinn handle the CBS Deals portion of the Evening News or will Gayle handle that?

Live from the Inner Ring of Dante's Inferno..."Local 10 News" from the Center of Hell"...

This fandom is so out of touch with real life if you're judging a news set to be a dud because it doesn't have all the bells and whistles and zooming graphics like the Fucking WSVN Newsplex. It's always, always, always fucking style over substance.

I'm just gonna put this in the most blunt way possible: I do not expect "the cap" to survive under any political regime for much longer. It is a dinosaur. You can make a convincing case to either "side" as to why it needs to go away. It's been 20 years since Congress last meddled with it, it's just going to take one of the not-Sinclair groups to make a stink about it to the right people. It's a dated method of calculating "reach" in a world where everyone is connected to everything. I've theorized before that this isn't going to start from a company wanting to buy more stations, but a company trying to sell stations and not finding a buyer. Sinclair begging to raise the cap so they can buy more hits a lot differently than, say, Disney saying they can't sell the O&O group because nobody who wants to buy it can because of the cap. The ownership cap on television stations is the least of Biden's worries. I really don't think the general public cares all that much.

Not sure why this continues to be a discussion. NBC Universal killed the idea a while ago. If one of the full networks decides to do this (I would bet on ABC first as a cost cutting move). then it is worth the discussion. Sorry. And why so much about Kansas City? It's all speculative.

CBS has its challenges as do all of the networks, but cutting loose a show at 12:30 am isn't exactly the sign of the apocalypse.

I get the impression that all ABC cares about is WSVN's ability and willingness to pay the reverse compensation.

Tom Brokaw was 64 when he left Nightly News in 2004. (I thought he was old then.) John Chancellor was 55. Lester wanting to step away now is just really part of the trend in tv news. Both Brokaw and Chancellor still did stuff for NBC after leaving the Nightly chair and Lester is also. As Walter Cronkite said, “Old anchormen, you see, don’t fade away; they just keep coming back for more.”

Well, it is FTVLive… CBS could do 100% what Uncle Walter did during his time and still complain.

Finally! CBS is being CBS. Instead of trying to copy and beat NBC and ABC, they are compiling a broadcast that fits CBS's ethos. It has the feel, pacing, and in-depth storytelling that is the hallmark of CBS News. I don't know how it will do long term in the ratings, but I applaud them for going their own way. Even the minimalistic graphics is refreshing. (Yes, I hate how the other two label everything as BREAKING NEWS.) But this also feels very CBS. 60 Minutes doesn't use lower thirds at all. They make it a point to incorporate the person's ID into the script. Every version of their morning show used to be a poor imitation of TODAY and Good Morning America. Remember their 5th Ave. streetside studio? It always felt like they were going against the grain, trying to be something that was unnatural for their organization. Until they stopped the cooking segments, concerts, Halloween parties, etc., that the others do well and focused on good storytelling and smart conversation. It hasn't set the ratings on fire, but they are doing something different, which works for them. Now, they appear to have embraced their DNA in the evenings by assembling one heck of a smart newscast.

It's all temporary as they move on from the election. I know many who just didn't want to watch any news, MSNBC, CNN, broadcast networks until they all moved past the election. I wouldn't make wide conclusions only 8 days past the election.

Full list: 2023-24 RANK 2024-25 RANK CHANGE IN RANK MARKET 2023-24 TV HOUSEHOLDS 2024-25 TV HOUSEHOLDS 1 1 0 New York, NY 7595250 7494510 2 2 0 Los Angeles, CA 5905230 5835790 3 3 0 Chicago, IL 3648640 3654750 5 4 1 Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX 3130430 3264490 4 5 -1 Philadelphia, PA 3176540 3145920 6 6 0 Houston. TX 2772680 2797420 7 7 0 Atlanta, GA 2737480 2758170 9 8 1 Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) 2577690 2630640 8 9 -1| Boston, MA (Manchester, NH) 2606030 2584460 10 10 0 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA 2520350 2542480 12 11 1 Tampa-St. Petersburg (Sarasota), FL 2143270 22221240 11 12 -1 Phoenix (Prescott), AZ 2174290 2198200 13 13 0 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 2070920 2098240 14 14 0 Detroit, MI 1929890 1940750 16 15 1 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1840340 1902420 15 16 -1 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 1861980 1886680 17 17 0 Denver, CO 1787410 1806270 18 18 0 Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL 1737000 1756920 19 19 0 Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH 1552900 1554340 20 20 0 Sacramento-Stockton-vodesto, CA 1525760 1497920 21 21 0 Charlotte, NC 1361740 1382020 22 22 0 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1333350 1345840 23 23 0 Portland, OR 1315030 1277920 24 24 0 St. Louis, MO 1285040 1273870 25 25 0 Indianapolis, IN 1205900 1232210 26 26 0 Nashville, TN 1191970 1199400 28 27 1 Pittsburgh, PA 1164860 1167890 27 28 -1 Salt Lake City, UT 1173870 1163520 29 29 0 Baltimore, MD 1161920 1155000 30 30 0 San Diego. CA 1122930 1116150 31 31 0 San Antonio, TX 1081400 1096400 32 32 0 Hartford & New Haven, CT 1034210 1060910 34 33 1 Kansas City, MO 1019080 1033680 35 34 1 Austin, TX 1000680 1029800 33 35 -2 Columbus. OH 1020490 1018390 36 36 0 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anders 950970 987740 37 37 0 Cincinnati, OH 940410 958630 38 38 0 Milwaukee, WI 931550 944900 39 39 0 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 912680 936790 40 40 0 Las Vegas, NV 888620 896460 41 41 0 Jacksonville, FL 799420 840340 44 42 2 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 774520 802360 42 43 -1 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek. MI 784190 801030 43 44 -1 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News. VA 776230 779970 46 45 1 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 756050 771860 45 46 -1 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 756270 766980 47 47 0 Oklahoma City, OK 737090 762700 49 48 1 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 702680 708050 48 49 -1 Louisville, KY 707810 702310 51 50 1 New Orleans, LA 672320 672790 50 51 -1 Memphis, TN 672720 666300 53 52 1 Providence, RI-New Bedford, MA 647790 662810 55 53 2 Ft. Myers-Naples, FL 623670 641850 54 54 0 Buffalo, NY 641090 637090 52 55 -3 Fresno-Visalia, CA 649430 636260 56 56 0 Richmond-Petersburg, VA 611040 625380 57 57 0 Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL 606020 605340 59 58 1 Little Rock-Pine Bluff, AR 587660 590980 58 59 -1| Wilkes Barre-Scranton-Hazleton. PA 588490 589190 61 60 1 Knoxville, TN 578600 584100 62 61 1 Tuisa, OK 557440 575780 60 62 -2 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 580560 575590 63 63 0 Lexington, KY 515060 517660 66 64 2 Dayton, OH 486650 498200 65 65 0 Tucson (Sierra Vista), AZ 498090 497660 64 66 -2 Spokane, WA 500010 496260 67 67 0 Des Moines-Ames, IA 482450 480550 69 68 1 Green Bay-Appleton, WI 475650 478970 68 69 -1 Honolulu, HI 476990 470520 70 70 0 Roanoke-Lynchburg, VA 458320 460000 72 71 1 Wichita-Hutchinson, KS Plus 455550 458990 74 72 2 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City, MI 444780 458710 71 73 -2 Omaha, NE 455600 458080 73 74 -1 Springfield, MO 445800 454280 81 75 6 Huntsville-Decatur (Florence), AL 423570 452230 75 76 -1 Columbia, SC 443360 450440 77 77 0 Madison, WI 433920 443220 78 78 0 Portland-Auburn, ME 433250 439030 76 79 -3 Rochester, NY 436060 435860 82 80 2 Harlingen-Weslaco-Brownsville-McAllen, TX 422200 428240 80 81 -1 Toledo, OH 426210 424050 79 82 -3 Charleston-Huntington, WV 426870 422160 83 83 0 Waco-Temple-Bryan, TX 411930 419600 85 84 1 Savannah, GA 391320 400190 88 85 3 Charleston, SC 388840 399960 84 86 -2 Chattanooga, TN 410010 391370 86 87 -1 Colorado Springs-Pueblo, CO 390400 388730 87 88 -1 Syracuse, NY 389240 387030 89 89 0 El Paso, TX (Las Cruces, NM) 378650 385080 90 90 0 Paducah, KY-Cape Girardeau, MO-Harrisburg, IL 374420 378520 92 91 1 Shreveport, LA 372960 375030 91 92 -1 Champaign & Springfield-Decatur, IL 373250 371520 93 93 0 Burlington, VT-Plattsburgh, NY 366420 369840 94 94 0 Cedar Rapids-Waterloo-lowa City & Dubuque, IA 364260 364130 95 95 0 Baton Rouge, LA 357270 355760 96 96 0 Ft. Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR 348990 352410 99 97 2 Myrtie Beach-Florence, SC 338230 347660 97 98 -1 Boise, ID 341580 345250 98 99 -1 Jackson, MS 339750 339170 100 100 0 South Bend-Elkhart, IN 328740 331800 101 101 0 Tri-Cities, TN-VA 326330 331520 102 102 0 Greenville-New Bern-Washington, NC 310640 319350 103 103 0 Reno, NV 310570 315350 104 104 0 Davenport, IA-Rock Island-Moline, IL 301920 304840 105 105 0 Tallahassee, FL-Thomasville, GA 300610 303530 109 106 3 Tyler-Longview(Lufkin & Nacogdoches), TX 288630 297900 106 107 -1 Lincoln & Hastings-Kearney, NE 295450 296500 110 108 2 Augusta, GA-Aiken, SC 287840 291070 107 109 -2 Evansville, IN 291550 290790 108 110 -2 Ft. Wayne. IN 290350 290520 111 111 0 Sioux Falls(Mitchell), SD 286580 286600 112 112 0 Johnstown-Altoona-State College, PA 285750 285520 114 113 1 Fargo, ND 269740 269310 116 114 2 Yakima-Pasco-Richland-Kennewick, WA 262240 268030 115 115 0 Springfield-Holyoke, MA 268000 267210 118 116 2 Traverse City-Cadillac, MI 259540 266960 113 117 -4 Lansing, MI 271010 265830 117 118 -1 Youngstown, OH 260040 263000 120 119 1 Macon, GA 255090 258400 119 120 -1 Eugene, OR 256350 256020 121 121 0 Montgomery-Selma, AL 251540 249100 123 122 1 Peoria-Bloomington, IL 248490 246270 122 123 -1 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-San Luis Obispo, CAl 248860 245950 125 124 1 Lafayette, LA 243740 245210 124 125 -1 Bakersfield, CA 247690 244310 128 126 2 Wilmington, NC 230510 240210 126 127 -1 Columbus, GA (Opelika, AL) 234620 234450 127 128 -1 Monterey-Salinas, CA 233940 230950 129 129 0 La Crosse-Eau Claire, Wi 223920 224120 130 130 0 Corpus Christi, TX 210480 209780 133 131 2 Salis bury, MD 193270 198930 131 132 -1 Amarillo, TX 195870 198790 132 133 -1 Wausau-Rhinelander, WI 195540 194130 135 134 1 Columbus-Tupelo-West Point-Houston, MS 190850 190950 136 135 1 Columbia-Jefferson City, MO 187170 190370 134 136 -2 Chico-Redding, CA 191030 188320 137 137 0 Rockford, IL 182070 180910 139 138 1 Duluth, MN-Superior, WI 176810 179710 138 139 -1 Medford-Klamath Falls, OR 179170 176990 141 140 1 Lubbock, TX 174470 176410 140 141 -1 Topeka, KS 175120 176250 142 142 0 Monroe, LA-EI Dorado, AR 173600 171300 144 143 1 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 169260 170420 147 144 3 Odessa-Midland, TX 160050 169390 143 145 -2 Palm Springs, CA 170150 167060 146 146 0 Anchorage, AK 165500 165750 145 147 -2 Bismarck-Minot-Dickinson(Williston),ND 168930 163860 148 148 0 Panama City, FL 158710 163100 150 149 1 Sioux City, IA 157500 157520 149 150 -1 Wichita Falls, TX & Lawton, OK 158250 156680 151 151 0 Joplin, MO-Pittsburg, KS 153990 155240 154 152 2 Albany, GA 151390 153090 152 153 -1 Rochester, MN-Mason City, IA-Austin, MN 152610 152720 153 154 -1 Erie, PA 152460 151250 155 155 0 Idaho Falls-Pocatello, ID (Jackson, WY) 147210 148180 156 156 0 Bangor, ME 146500 147060 158 157 1 Gainesville, FL 143480 146560 157 158 -1 Biloxi-Gulfport, MS 144350 144960 159 159 0 Terre Haute, IN 141090 142660 160 160 0 Sherman, TX-Ada, OK 136540 140220 161 161 0 Missoula, MT 136440 138300 162 162 0 Binghamton, NY 133620 132690 163 163 0 Wheeling, W-Steubenville, OH 126590 126550 164 164 0 Yuma, AZ-EI Centro, CA 122010 124660 165 165 0 Billings, MT 121170 120120 167 166 1 Abilene-Sweetwater, TX 117830 120020 166 167 -1 Bluefield-Beckley-Oak Hill, WV 119760 119330 168 168 0 Hatties burg-Laurel, MS 113740 114160 169 169 0 Rapid City, SD 108880 110060 170 170 0 Dothan, AL 107820 108770 171 171 0 Utica, NY 103310 102160 172 172 0 Clarksburg-Weston, WV 100640 101120 174 173 1 Harrisonburg, VA 99720 100920 175 174 1 Jackson, TN 98790 99740 176 175 1 Quincy, IL-Hannibal, MO-Keokuk, IA 98590 99650 173 176 -3 Charlottesville, VA 100520 99260 177 177 0 Lake Charles, LA 98130 97170 178 178 0 Elmira (Corning), NY 95420 94030 179 179 0 Watertown, NY 93680 93350 180 180 0 Bowling Green, KY 91260 93320 181 181 0 Marquette, MI 88290 89550 183 182 1 Jonesboro, AR 87600 89400 182 183 -1 Alexandria, LA 87870 85710 186 184 2 Laredo, TX 82720 84750 184 185 -1 Butte-Bozeman, MT 82820 83590 185 186 -1 Bend, OR 82760 83160 187 187 0 Grand Junction-Montrose, CO 80830 81090 189 188 1 Twin Falls, ID 75070 77070 188 189 -1 Lafayette, IN 75190 74620 190 190 0 Lima, OH 70150 69630 191 191 0 Great Falls, MT 66110 66390 192 192 0 Meridian, MS 65280 64660 194 193 1 Cheyenne, WY-Scotts bluff, NE 61010 60950 193 194 -1 Parkersburg, W 61720 60660 196 195 1 Greenwood-Greenville, MS 60640 59980 195 196 -1 Eureka, CA 60870 59670 197 197 0 San Angelo, TX 58460 57040 198 198 0 Casper-Riverton, WY 56870 56860 199 199 0 Mankato, MN 56310 56190 200 200 0 Ottumwa, IA-Kirksville, MO 46450 47020

Weigel is launching another diginet, MeTV Toons, on June 25. Pretty much an outgrowth of MeTV's existing Monday-Saturday cartoon blocks (Toon In with Me and Saturday Morning Cartoons) and a broadcast equivalent of Boomerang (both its original all-classic cartoon format and its current daytime-only classic block), it will feature shows and shorts like Looney Tunes, Scooby-Doo, Tom & Jerry, The Flintstones, The Jetsons, Yogi Bear, Popeye, Rocky and Bullwinkle, Woody Woodpecker, Casper, Betty Boop, and Speed Racer. Bob Bergen, the voice behind various Looney Tunes characters (like Porky Pig, Tweety and Marvin the Martian), will be the announcer for the network.